On 1/8/06, Delirium <delirium(a)hackish.org> wrote:
So long as their license is compatible with the GFDL
(which if they
bootstrap from Wikipedia it'll have to be), I see no problems with it.
If they produce useful improvements in content quality on some articles
that they get reviewed by experts, we can fold in those changes to
Wikipedia, too.
I recall hearing they were planning to use a combination of
all-rights-reserved full copyright and an as of yet undetermined
Creative Commons license (probably one incompatible with the GFDL).
--
--~~~~
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wikiacc