[WikiEN-l] Blocking anon page creation was an experiment, wasn't it?

Fri Aug 25 16:08:52 UTC 2006

Steve Bennett wrote:
> I was about to suggest that anons be allowed to create redirects, but
> there would be the obvious loophole that they could edit it
> afterwards. Then again, editing a redirect is pretty much creating a
> new article, so maybe that should be banned anyway for anons.

Why should even _more_ activities be banned when we haven't even seen an
analysis of the results of the _previous_ set of activities that were
banned?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20060825/4cb8cb13/attachment.pgp 