On 8/8/06, Dabljuh <dabljuh(a)gmx.net> wrote:
And in the individual articles, bill and bob get to
represent their
indvidual views and arguments independently. The advantage being,
that each view is given the opportunity to make a coherent
argument: I can read bill's take, and I can read bob's take,
and decide for myself which one of them is more credible.
That's the extremely optimistic view. In reality, all bob supporters
go to the bob page, and the bill supporters go to bill's page, and
both pages end up containing masses of unsupported hero worship and
being useless to anyone.
There's no reason not to explain both sets of arguments on the one
page. Your argument was a bit flawed in that you were contrasting
"Bill thinks pie is good" (one page model) with "bill gets to present
his individual views" (multiple page model). That's not a real
comparison.
Steve