On 4/28/06, Ricky Reno <juice2122(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
There has been no explanation as to how this alleged consensus has taken
place. It's because there is no actual consensus on this. The only
consensus
that exists is merely between the people on one side of the dispute. .
Alkivar has certainly misused his power on this occasion. It is very
irresponsible that Alkivar would resort to blocking someone for a month
without even bothering to discuss it with the individual. Does anyone know
Alkivar's email address so that I may reason with him?
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
You were the only one editing the page to not include "King of Pop" and
"Wacko Jacko". You hadn't given a reason for removing the names. Referring
to "The Kingof Pop", the name has become (even to me as a Brit) synomonous
to Jackson. Just as Presley is The King (of Rock and Roll). You can't say
that Jackson's habits aren't exactly normal either. You made no attempt to
compromise, just wanting both names removed. Alkivar's block is justified,
you were disrupting Wikipedia.
--
-Sceptre
http://tintower.co.uk