-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
jayjg stated for the record:
No, what the second admin should do is discuss the
case with the first
admin, rather than unblocking. Maybe the first admin has evidence
that the second admin is unaware of. If the second admin has
conclusive evidence, then the first admin will undoubtedly unblock. If
not, then there is a dispute, and the second admin should not wheel
war. In any event, admins should not act under the bad faith
supposition that *they know better*; that is what starts the wheel
war.
Jay.
The statement "if the second admin has conclusive evidence, then the
first admin will undoubtedly unblock" has been recently demonstrated to
be untrue -- the conclusive evidence that Eloquence is not a danger to
the project is patent, yet Danny (first admin) reverted my (second
admin's) unblocking.
- --
Sean Barrett | Power corrupts. Atomic power corrupts atomically.
sean(a)epoptic.org |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFES9sTMAt1wyd9d+URAkXEAJ96AaGa9/XVQXWQ/u9hh9ybMf5PPgCcChJZ
JNrExuNcIQg2G5E9Gz0DW78=
=05M3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----