On 4/8/06, David Alexander Russell
<webmaster(a)davidarussell.co.uk> wrote:
So, in other words, we need an accepted definition
for what constitutes
deletable child porn on Wikipedia. Something like
Any image, whether a photograph, drawing, or render, which depicts
minors engaged in sexual activity or sexually suggestive poses.
Let's be stronger: Any image containing:
- elements of erotica,
- and depictions of people, real or fictitious, apparently under 18.
I don't really see the argument for being inclusionist. Keeping
borderline cases causes us problems, and causes us to have to justify
those inclusions.
Hmm. Where does a screenshot from /Lolita/ stand under this criteria?
(Having neither read the book nor seen the movies, I apologise if this
question is irrelevant.)
--
Mark Gallagher
"What? I can't hear you, I've got a banana on my head!"
- Danger Mouse
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.0/305 - Release Date: 8/04/2006