On Apr 5, 2006, at 6:57 AM, Matt R wrote:
I agree that
'pedophile' might have been a bit strong. Perhaps
'people
who believe that Wikipedia has a duty to provide pedophiles with
child
porn regardless of the law' would be a more accurate, objective
description.
\I don't think your description is particularly fair or objective.
I support the removal
of the image in question, but I recognise that at least some of
those who argued
for it to be it kept did so out of good faith and a desire to
create the best encyclopedia
possible. I don't think they were trolling or motivated by a desire
to supply pedophiles
with child porn.
I agree with Matt. This is not a profitable direction for discussion.
--
Philip L. Welch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philwelch