steve v wrote:
Fair enough, but I was responding more to an apparent
trend to use disambiguations as hatnotes - above
article notes which say things like 'this article is
about the bar with the fubbly fub, know as foo. For
the fub with the bubbly bar, see [[Barfoo]].' etc.
A short 'for other uses, see [[Foo (disambiguation)]]
should always suffice, and if there is only one thing
to link to, then that should be in a section. It costs
an extra click, but spares us article clutter, which I
really dislike.
I concur. It's just like top posting on mailing lists. You have to read
too much crap to work out the context.
--
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \