On 10/27/05, Ryan Delaney <ryan.delaney(a)gmail.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alphax wrote:
I've said it before, I'll say it again:
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.
Wikipedia being a wiki is a means to an end, NOT the other way
around.
Naturally. But that isn't an answer to the point I was making. If
someone wants to say that "PWD is terrible because there would be edit
wars" they have to explain why deletion edit wars would be any more
horrible than content or vandalism edit wars. We can handle the last
two well enough; what's wrong with the first? It just doesn't explain
the basis for the judgment that deletion ought to be treated
differently from other edits.
Ryan
Sure we can deal with vandalism and edit wars, but those are nearly
unavoidable. Deletion wars can be avoided. Sure we can deal with them,
but why create them if they're avoidable in the first place?
--Mgm