[WikiEN-l] Re: Quality

Mon Oct 24 19:55:35 UTC 2005

On 10/24/05, Anthony DiPierro <wikispam at inbox.org> wrote:
>  So deletion is the only solution to something that is low quality? I would
> think making it higher quality would also suffice.
>

yeah but I think we have fairly firmly established that that isn't happening.

>  Not at all. I'm an inclusionist, and I'd much rather have better articles
> than more articles. However 1) I think deletion is a waste of time that
> could be better spent improving articles, and 2) I don't think the two are
> mutually exclusive, I think you can have more articles *and* better
> articles.
>  So please, if you're not an inclusionist, don't speak for us. That's called
> a strawman argument.
>

1)I can delete stuff at a rate of more than once a second

2)Errr that isn't happening.

3)It's called Reductio ad absurdum. The logical endpoint of the
inclusionist position is to include everything.

--
geni