[WikiEN-l] Unnecessary nudity on [[Hogtie bondage]]

Mon Oct 24 16:52:09 UTC 2005

--- BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > First, I'd like to state that, in general, I support Wikipedia being
> > explicit in its illustration where necessary. I have never had a
> > problem with potentially-offensive photos on pages like [[penis]],
> > [[clitoris]] and the like.
> 
> You have never had a problem with from an American viewpoint
> potentially-offensive images? OK. I have never had a problem with
> potentially-offensive photos (and text!) on pages like [[female]],
> [[hair]], [[feet]], [[homosexual]], etc... By saying that only
> [[penis]] and [[clitoris]] are potentially offensive but not the other
> examples I mentioned, you are implying that your viewpoint is the
> supreme one and more important than all others.

I don't really understand what you're getting at here, but I'd like to point
out that I'm British, not American.

-- Matt

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matt_Crypto
Blog: http://cipher-text.blogspot.com

___________________________________________________________ 
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com