You could possibly have concurring opinions at the bottom of each argument
similar to Supreme Court decisions.
Keith
User:Capitalistroadster
On 10/24/05, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I support the idea of forcing people to actually argue their view, but
I see a lot of problems with the current idea.
1) The decision of the closing admin is always going to be questioned.
2) Having only arguments doesn't show how many people actually endorse
these views.
3) Debates on schools and roads will probably have an equal amount of
delete and keep arguments of which the validness is impossible to
establish as both "sides" think the other side is wrong and end up in
endless counter aguments.
And if we were to force actual arguments we should also find a way to
make people actually read an article and vote based on its merit and
not a view on the general category of articles.
--Mgm
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l