-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
JAY JG wrote:
From: Alphax
<alphasigmax(a)gmail.com>
Delirium wrote:
Alphax wrote:
What about if the author has blogged about (some
current event) that
they witnessed or attended?
That still seems like a shaky source. That's basically saying, "some
guy on the internet claims he saw this happen". If I "blogged" about
witnessing an event on my Wikipedia User page, could we cite that as a
source?
What's the difference between a blog and any other page on the internet?
Blogs have no editorial standards, no way of verifying that anything on
them is correct, true, relevant, notable, reliable, sane. Blogs are
only good as sources for articles about those specific blogs.
You still haven't answered my question: what's the difference between a
blog and ANY OTHER WEBSITE?
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQ1i77bMAAH8MeUlWAQi4MQgAgw0oH7WX1bUWll0FkZkkvS8zAlMWCpYe
Pg+x/QeA5y0HysVBaKZyD/3+BECQcjh2XuNIQjHlFer3792GJK1tHkp3b3GUesIs
VH+tri9tCivxPMuej1sUqos8LlyF9ALEgklnvtn9Zs+0cZ30Kcv+GouRFUf4NR9I
Ld+6r8LhV0bK1MxVQaatain7v06TAvzYBGBQ/XbwMxgDzhlXU0l09C0aQgECNQAr
IHwhA+oa/FxHCeyrQeID1eo0lk4Rzcf2esfvpWXwcxA7Ws5/yVAT9f/cb2IPsorp
2ZQW78qritCn/yNTWgOmj/Mj42mNf4HYnWGAr8gCJy3vFd1VADzC/w==
=2nQZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----