Why should there be a requirement that someone has to
waste time by
repeating the explanations given by other people for deleting an article?
If an article is non-notable, it's non-notable. There is no requirement that
anyone who votes has to write explanations for anything. When you have 150
AFD noms per day, it is absurd to suggest that there is some sort of
obligation to explain votes, especially when so many nominations are
uncontested junk.
Very true. That is why I have many times contemplated writing an
hourly cron script that votes "Keep, this article is notable" on each
and every article on AfD. I have always assumed that such behaviour
would be frowned upon. But if it is as you say, that the deletionists
doesn't waste too many neutrons/vote, then why should I?
I'm pretty sure I could have this script completed before tonight...
I'm very sure that there are alot of other rabid inclusionists out
there that would also like to script-vote... Yes, this IS a threat.
--
mvh Björn