On 10/8/05, actionforum(a)comcast.net <actionforum(a)comcast.net> wrote:
Seconded. The 3RR is an electric fence, not an
entitlement. It *really
doesn't matter* if the article is on [[m:The Wrong Version]] for a
while longer. It really doesn't. Consistently running up 3 reversions
every 24 hours is prima facie evidence of failure to work with others.
It only takes one motivated party for failure to work together. Sometimes
reverting is a way to bring them to the table.
If we should want to use edit-warring as a tool to achieve this end, we
should do so in full awareness that its over-use is ill-regarded by the
community and may land us with a block. In particular, we should not
complain when over-zealous use of reverts in the face of multiple opposition
lands us with a 3RR block.