-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Phroziac wrote:
Fred Bauder wrote:
Many folks who run for arbitrator, and are
elected, fail to work out,
as being a Wikipedia Arbitrator involves very tedious and time
consuming research into the edits made by the parties. I suggest that
all administrators be considered potential arbitrators. Those among the
administrators who are willing and able to do the work involved should,
by demonstration of their work, assume the role.
I suggest that any administrator should be able to "accept" an
arbitration and then participate in resolving it.
Fred
Sounds good to me.
Agreed. If we can't trust admins, who *can* we trust?
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQ0Th8rMAAH8MeUlWAQi45wf+OFjZHz+M4lzWxXlL+7m9/r7uMb3i7TLI
OsM4RQUjK7VhNSSqOEcYIQp89v6k9IkHD+YxPzRaQPEnaVpUb29+SEPqkDAbMVuV
OQj22Mg07prkwN3Nir+byCeofWxudIzEasd+74rwk13m8YP6bb720v8wTNhzYuXl
WHnULZmrNJuPb0q7LfYGuLoks/G9B2tpkU0vxAS2NadUeIPzCbzwHdKaWtC3wyYK
M0B6wsJHjg5wJKhNALzf4lTmhCeVUeYYAwIvaZJnx4OO88lya9duyYpZRmO67LUy
ha0ixni/rixXkVMa9E2YKWSIAu4mEaOX0vCZTXjH+eUO2wgw8tW3BA==
=XSVv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----