[WikiEN-l] How many Arbitrators should we have?

Wed Oct 5 16:00:48 UTC 2005

>
> Perhaps this just means we should expand the pool of
> Arbitrators and elect 20 or 30 this time around as
> some people had proposed (though one might have
> trouble finding enough people to run).

 I fail to see how having more arbitrators would do anything but cause the
process to be less efficient. The only reason we have more than one
arbitrator is because it's more democratic that way, not because it's more
efficient.