Tony Sidaway wrote:
so much of the best that Wikipedia has to offer
comprises mediocrely written articles that tell you pretty much what you
need to know, and generally do it in less than a screenful of information
and without pointless fripperies such as pictures.
That seems to me a rather limited view of Wikipedia's strengths and
potential. You might as well say we're aspiring to nothing more than
creating exactly the same stuff you can find on virtually any website on
the internet.
--Michael Snow