[WikiEN-l] What Wikipedia Admins are, anyway

Tue May 31 20:24:54 UTC 2005

> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 21:04:15 -0700
> From: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple.com>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] And the bad faith continues from Wikipedia.
>       ALL ADMINS      are Rogue Admins
> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> Message-ID: <429BE23F.9050600 at apple.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Cranston Snord wrote:
>
> > Apparently, for following Wikipedia policy and bringing my complaints,
> > I have been blocked.
> >
> > I am not going to swear at you, despite SlimVirgin's lies and David
> > Gerard's profanity.
> >
> > But I hope you are happy. I now know why Wikipedia isn't worth
> > anything. It's because Wikipedia policy isn't worth the electrons used
> > to store it.
> >
> > All Wikipedia Admins ARE Rogue Admins.
>
> Personally I favor being a Barbarian Admin, although
> Archaeologist Admin is good for a change of pace, and
> Valkyrie Admin has its equipment advantages at lower
> levels.
>
> Stan

How about Viking Admin? :-)