<snip>
He left a
> message on my talk page and I had written up a response to him stating
> that if he wanted to move it, he should sign up for an account and
> move it, that the article space is not the place for his opinion
> regarding the title of articles.
That isn't the topic, and it isn't
my opinion, it arises form a
discussion on an academic list (evidence-based-health(a)jiscmail.ac.uk
which for non-UK people is the joint information services ctee for all
UK universities and is populated by people who know far more about
EBM/EBH than I but are less au fait with Wikis) upon the definition of
EBM. The opinion you'd gather is that EBM is better refered to a
subclass of EBH
<snip>
I didn't look at the EBM/EBH pages and I'm not debating or really
concerned with what goes where. None of this has anything to do with
whether or not I (or we) agree with what a page should be called. If
you want to move one page to another location, sign up for an account
and do it (since page moves are restricted to logged in users). The
point is that writing in an article "So and so page should be here" is
not something that belongs in the article space. If you wanted it
moved, you could have moved it yourself, written a note on a talk
page, dropped a note on the "requested moves" page, asked an editor of
the EBM/EBH pages on their talk page about moving it, etc. Feel free
to do any of these.