On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:49 +0100, sannse wrote:
Derk wrote:
> I would have replied directly to the message, but I just signed up to
> the list. Anyway, this person created an article containing
> "Arguably, a better name for the article on Evidence_Based_Medicine
> Evidence Based Medicine." This is not encyclopedic.
Stub?
Disambigution page?
He left a
> message on my talk page and I had written up a response to him stating
> that if he wanted to move it, he should sign up for an account and
> move it, that the article space is not the place for his opinion
> regarding the title of articles.
That isn't the topic, and it isn't
my opinion, it arises form a
discussion on an academic list (evidence-based-health(a)jiscmail.ac.uk
which for non-UK people is the joint information services ctee for all
UK universities and is populated by people who know far more about
EBM/EBH than I but are less au fait with Wikis) upon the definition of
EBM. The opinion you'd gather is that EBM is better refered to a
subclass of EBH
As I went to reply, I got an edit
> conflict on his user talk page in which he decided to call me
> "cryptodork".
Sorry. Not used to American names and spelling. We usually spell a
name Dirk.
And so you banned the guy? Perhaps a little quick on
the block button
there... one (mildish) comment, and a newbie mistake on what to do with
a misnamed page really isn't blockable IMO. Perhaps it's time to
revisit [[WP:BITE]]
--sannse
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l --
Adrian Midgley <amidgley2(a)defoam.net>