JAY JG (jayjg(a)hotmail.com) [050521 02:34]:
>And are you asserting this is regular practice? Or
did people issue lots of
>"keep" votes in response to an unreasonable flood of nominations? Are the
>words "unclean hands" applicable to this protest?
As you well know, the history of organized school
inclusionism long
precedes this particular and very recent set of school VfDs, and even
stooped to the level of sockpuppet voting.
So you don't mean of late, your evidence of robotic voting closely
resembles the editing pattern of several of us you're arguing this point
with, and you mean the one (it was one) person running a pile of
sockpuppets you will now see absent.
So if Tony or I can be classed as "schools inclusionists", does that mean
we're doing robotic voting with insinuations of sockpuppetry, are these
other people you fingered as robo-voters even though the complained-of
voting pattern resembles ours running sockpuppets, or what do you mean?
Your stated concern is not staying constant in the course of the discussion.
You are notably failing to acknowledge that placing fifty schools at once
on VFD could possibly be a provocative act that could arouse great
attention, really upset people and in fact cause people to get involved, as
Tony documents in detail. Do you see that it could be taken that way?
- d.