JAY JG (jayjg(a)hotmail.com) [050520 06:37]:
Not true. I know there are people who believe *most*
school articles
should be kept. But the boilerplate votes in short periods of time which
make no reference at all to the article or the VfD page are examples of
something else, and in particular, when I see someone voting "keep, good
stub" etc. on a completely useless stub.
Yeah, that I'd attribute to exasperation. Apparently-spammed nominations
leading to apparently-spammed kep votes.
Of course, they might actually think it was a stub with a future. Are any
of them working on the school stubs?
Rather than impugning their edits here, you could ask them nicely and see
what they say. Might be interesting.
- d.