[WikiEN-l] Re: Corrected (Wollmann)

Thu May 12 00:45:20 UTC 2005

Poor, Edmund W wrote:

>Is it crucial to Wikipedia's integrity that we INCLUDE a mention of the
>fact that some anonymous troublemakers have branded a non-notable
>private citizen with a very annoying label?
>
>  
>
It seems to me based on what I've seen over the past week or two of this 
debate that Wollman is both notable and public.

I think it is important ("crucial" may be overstating it) to Wikipedia's 
integrity that it doesn't remove notable, verifiable information about 
someone from articles solely based on the complaints and apparently 
groundless legal threats of that person.