How about 'suspended'? Equally accurate and less terminal-sounding than
block.
Hi everyone, by the way. As you might guess from my e-mail address, I am
User:Worldtraveller.
-----Original Message-----
From: Asbestos [mailto:asbestos999@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 May 2005 17:29
To: English Wikipedia
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] "block" considered too harsh a word?
If users can't be bothered to read the part of the message where it says
they've been blocked for just 24 hours, they're going to throw a fit no
matter what the word is. "Blocked" itself is a neutral word: it accurately
describes the fact that they can no longer edit.
This reminds me of the idea that some schools are now requiring their
teachers to grade papers in purple pens, because a red F apparently
distresses some students...
Sam
--
Asbestos
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Asbestos
On 5/10/05, Timwi <timwi(a)gmx.net> wrote:
As we have seen numerous times in the past, users who are new to the
Wikipedia tend
to vastly overreact to being blocked. Some people throw
quite a fit even when they're blocked for a mere 24 hours.
A friend of mine suggested that perhaps the word should be changed to
something
more euphemistic and something less harsh than "block". I can
sympathise with this thinking, because if I saw a page telling me I'm
"blocked", not knowing what it means I would probably interpret it to mean
"blocked indefinitely", and as we know people don't tend to read the
entire message and hence don't notice where it mentions the time limit.
Unfortunately, he didn't have any ideas what to call it instead. So I'm
wondering what everyone else here thinks?
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Asbestos
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
PLEASE NOTE: THE ABOVE MESSAGE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE INTERNET.
On entering the GSi, this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by
Energis in partnership with MessageLabs.
Please see
http://www.gsi.gov.uk/main/notices/information/gsi-003-2002.pdf
for further details.
In case of problems, please call your organisational IT helpdesk