[WikiEN-l] RE: Corrected

Thu May 5 23:58:07 UTC 2005

slimvirgin at gmail.com stated for the record:

> On 5/5/05, David 'DJ' Hedley <spyders at btinternet.com> wrote:
> 
> This is perhaps an inappopriate discussion to have in public because a
> legal action has been threatened, but in brief, the fact that you
> report, but do not endorse, a claim is not a defense in a libel
> action. If you spread it, you spread it.
> 
> Sarah

Truth is an absolute defense against charges of libel.  It is true that 
the Usenet group alt.usenet.kooks named Wollmann a kook.  I can repeat 
that true statement as often as I like, and Wollmann's lawsuits would be 
groundless if they weren't merely empty threats.

The Usenet group alt.usenet.kooks named Wollmann a kook.
The Usenet group alt.usenet.kooks named Wollmann a kook.
The Usenet group alt.usenet.kooks named Wollmann a kook.

-- 
  Sean Barrett     | Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:
  sean at epoptic.com | That alone should encourage the crew.
                   | Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:
                   | What I tell you three times is true.