[WikiEN-l] Re: ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] 3RR applied to both parties?
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] An awfully big adventure (was ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>From: "Tony Sidaway" <minorityreport at bluebottle.com>
>
>Someone who is scared to take a complaint to the
>arbitration committee because he may then be held accountable for his own
>actions is, it seems to me, missing the point.

Missing the point indeed; the point being that few people come out looking 
completely spotless under the kind of forensic examination that sometimes 
happens in the inevitable counter-suits, combined with the fear that ArbCom 
will feel it needs to sanction both parties, so that it appears "fair".  
Again, I'm not saying this is actually happening, but that there is a 
perception that this is happening, which discourages people from getting 
involved.

Jay.

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] 3RR applied to both parties?
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] An awfully big adventure (was ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]