[WikiEN-l] Requests for adminship reform

Sat Jun 25 12:02:14 UTC 2005

On 6/25/05, Chris Jenkinson <talrias at gmail.com> wrote:
> Fine, this wasn't a necessary part of the proposal. The reason I added
> it was mainly due to time concerns for the Arbitration Committee - a
> decision appears to take a long time, and in that time the "bad" admin
> could do more damage.

This is still a solution desperately in search of a problem. We have
one incident in recent times where this *did* occur, and the admin
involved was very quickly desysopped by consensus to protect the
content they were deleting, in the similar manner to the way Mr.
Treason was hardbanned by general agreement. If, god forbid, such an
incident occurred again, it could very easily be dealt with by the
same measures. And if it is not that urgent, then it hurts none to go
through due process.

-- ambi