[WikiEN-l] I am very concerned by the arbcomm decision against jguk

Sun Jun 19 19:38:37 UTC 2005

To be fair, in my experience, often one can provide evidence and  
still not have much of the arbcom read it....

-Snowspinner

On Jun 19, 2005, at 6:55 AM, Rebecca wrote:

> Folks, if you don't provide evidence, then don't be surprise when your
> concerns aren't included in a ruling. The vast amount of evidence
> there points to the conclusion I noted before - there are piles upon
> piles of examples of Jguk systematically changing stuff, and about
> four examples of SouthernComfort doing the same thing. We can only
> consider what is put before us, and almost all of that relates to
> Jguk.
>
> -- ambi
>
> On 6/19/05, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> The issue here, though, is that deciding on these issues (as with
>>> whether to use American or English English) comes down to the  
>>> editors
>>> of a particular article. There appears to be widespread agreement on
>>> the particular articles involved (of which SouthernComfort was  
>>> one of
>>> the editors) that BCE-CE was preferable in this instance. Jguk then
>>> went around changing them to his preference anyway, regardless of  
>>> the
>>> article consensus - and that's what isn't on.
>>>
>>> -- ambi
>>>
>>>
>>
>> But this isn't true. SouthernComfort hit artices on which he had no
>> previous editing history.
>>
>> geni
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>