--- BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Actually
it's generally customary to protect an
arbitrary version,
unless there is an overwhelming majority (i.e.
only one person versus
everyone else). If it's even remotely close,
we
just protect a random
version, so as to avoid continuing edit wars over
which version should
be protected.
I don't think I have *ever* witnessed an admin
protect a page to
revistion that person did not favour. So it can't be
*totally* random.
:) I'd say that the custom is to protect to a the
version that gets
most votes, if the number of votes one casts is
proportional to how
much social influence one has. But it is a bad
custom. Besides, now
you have also received a written *request* to
change to the majority
opinions version. SlimVirgin also said that she
would "allow" other
persons than Eyeon to edit the page.
What an utterly OUTRAGEOUS comment! Who the HELL do
you think you are? To make such a vicious attack on
the good names of each and every single admin?! I am
appalled, and I, personally, demand an apology!
RickK
__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html