[WikiEN-l] On agreeing to disagree

Wed Jun 15 12:31:21 UTC 2005

No IP check is being performed. SlimVirgin doesn't care about evidence. She 
has said she will ignore the results of an IP check, and she said she will 
continue to ban me from editing this article for 'being disruptive'.

I am being denied due process. Should I just 'agree' to stay banned?

Meanwhile, public support for my edit has swelled to 18 to 10 to 2 to 1 on 
the talk:feces page (four categories of votes.)

It is not 'disruptive' to revert a minority's censorship three times a day. 
It is not 'sockpuppetry' when others also take a stand.

>Can't you two just agree to disagree? SlimVirgin, don't call Eyeon a troll 
>or someone with sockpuppets until
>you get some evidence from a developer and Eyeon, don't immediately
>assume SlimVirgin is editing in bad faith. After all, SlimVirgin does
>have a point about the deleted article and similar editing styles.
>
>--Mgm

_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® 
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963