I thought categories were for rational organization? In any event, I
don't consider categories very explicit -- at least in the Monobook
skin, they are at the BOTTOM of the page, the LAST thing available to
the reader. I like my nonsense to be labeled in a bright neon sign, if
possible. But I understand this to be a somewhat undefendable bias of
sorts.
FF
On 6/14/05, Timwi <timwi(a)gmx.net> wrote:
Fastfission wrote:
I think making it VERY explicit -- i.e. in the
title of an article --
that a given description of events is a work of imagination rather
than some sort of factual account is always a good idea.
But that's what categories are for.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l