On 6/7/05, Erik Moeller <erik_moeller(a)gmx.de> wrote:
Mark Pellegrini:
The Arbitration Committee is seeking public
commentary and suggestions
pertaining to an ongoing problem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/RFC
I will state here for the record that I'm strongly opposed to any
content arbitration committee. Decisions like this should be made by the
community, not by elected or appointed representatives. The solution to
dealing with prolonged disputes is to establish clear community
procedures to make decisions, such as binding votes under clear
conditions (e.g. a discussion has been going on for X weeks, all
arguments have been summarized, all options of the vote have been agreed
upon in consensus ..). Wikipedia does not need an editorial staff.
As I've often stated, if you absolutely rule out voting as a last
resort, you end up with clubs and cabals which make decisions instead.
This is exactly what a content committee would eventually become. Don't
destroy the village in order to save it.
Erik
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I never understood why so many people oppose votes. It's an easy way
to see how the land lies and what the general opinion is. In my
opinion that's helpful.
--Mgm