Steven Ericsson Zenith wrote:
A brief contrarian point of view. If Wikipedia is to
succeed in any
measure to move beyond its tabloid status then transparency is essential.
That is, every admin must necessarily have their identity exposed and
it surprises me somewhat to see the resistance here - and I find it
hard to justify.
Ah, but admins don't control the content, do they? In just a quick
glance at several of the encyclopedias I have lying around, none of them
mention who wrote each article, most don't source their facts and many
don't have editors listed by name anywhere in the set. What makes
Wikipedia so special?
Jareth (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jareth)