[WikiEN-l] why the well-dressed stub is sorted (Re:Defamatory Biographies - another problem looming forWikipedia?)

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] why the well-dressed stub is sorted (Re:Defamatory Biographies - another problem looming forWikipedia?)
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] why the well-dressed stub is sorted (Re:Defamatory Biographies - another problem looming forWikipedia?)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Mark Gallagher" wrote

> Stub-sorting is a worthwhile effort; I don't think it's as useful as the 
> WSS believe it is, but we're better off having those users concentrating 
> on WSS matters than leaving altogether.

IMNSHO, it's useful, but I myself would give priority to categorising 
articles without good category.  Which must increase the chances of getting 
articles improved by a greater factor.

Charles 

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] why the well-dressed stub is sorted (Re:Defamatory Biographies - another problem looming forWikipedia?)
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] why the well-dressed stub is sorted (Re:Defamatory Biographies - another problem looming forWikipedia?)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]