slimvirgin(a)gmail.com wrote:
<snip>
Because lots of editors focus on the centrality of NPOV, they feel
they have to include a criticism from somewhere, anywhere, and you end
up with an article that reads like this: "Jane Doe (born 1938) was a
Roman Catholic nun and aid worker, described by the New York Times as
'the embodiment of Christ on earth.' The Roman Catholic church has
been heavily criticized for the willingness of its followers to
interfere in the affairs of the developing world, according to
Militant Magazine."
<snip>
Sarah
But if there is no published criticism of the nun, it certainly would
not be POV to exclude the (obviously unsourced) criticism, no? NPOV is
about representing all the different POVs about a subject without
favouring any of them. If it so happens that there is only one
(published) POV of a subject, then representing only that POV would be
neutral, no? :-{
John Lee
([[User:Johnleemk]])