--- Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net> wrote:
I know it seems drastic, but there was not > one
source cited.
{{sofixit}}, dont {{fuckitup}}.
Basically it was just the sort of chatting > we
used
to do in the Navy. We called it
scuddlebutt.
No, its called "scuttling other peoples work in the
name of policy." Citing sources is a requirement, but
its not a prerequisite. Volunteers are not on a
schedule and there is no timeframe nor deadline for an
article's development. The article needed to be there.
Its there due to the work of the
"off-their-medications" and retired set to whom
Wikipedia owes its early existence.
Deletionism is evil when it makes claims to being an
editorial decision. Willy on Wheels could have done
the same thing. The issue (for anyone who considers
making any change to any artice) is: are you helping
to develop it or are you claiming to be in an
editorial position to simply scuttle it?
Stevertigo
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com