I know it seems drastic, but there was not one source cited.
Basically it was just the sort of chatting we used to do in the Navy.
We called it scuddlebutt.
Fred
On Dec 17, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Bryan Derksen wrote:
stevertigo wrote:
Um, I speedy de-AFD the Kennedy assassination
theories
article (it had no delete votes, 13 keep, and 3
neutrals) and Fred wiped most of the page.
Is Fred pulling an Ed? (or a Steve?). Is frustration
getting the best of some of us?
A lot of the votes in this particular case were of the form "we
should have an article on this subject, so don't delete, but the
text we currently have there is in pretty dire shape so it'll need
a heavy reworking." My own was along those lines too. The stub that
Fred reduced it to was a little too small, IMO there's a bit more
salvageable material in the current article than that, but not
really out of line.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l