Anthony wrote:
On 12/13/05, Steve Block <steve.block at
myrealbox.com> wrote:
> Anthony DiPierro wrote:
> > On 12/13/05, Steve Block <steve.block at myrealbox.com> wrote:
Wikipedia does not and should not give legal advice.
If you'd like to
do research on what the laws are your contribution to the encyclopedia
would be greatly appreciated. But the foundation can't and shouldn't
force anyone to do that research.
I did quite a bit of research. However, since Wikipedia apparently
should not offer legal advice, I removed all such research since it
constitutes offering legal advice. The only people who can really
contribute on understanding of the laws would be judges and lawyers. I
cannot affrord to pay a lawyer for his opinion and since, as with all
areas of information, it is best to engage an expert, it appears this
recourse is blocked.
If you can come up with a way to be in better compliance with the laws
of a particular jurisdiction without removing useful information from
the encyclopedia, then I think we should definitely consider it.
Based on what you've already stated, I would say it is impossible to be
able to offer such a suggestion, since if no guidance is offered on what
may contravene laws in certain jurisdictions, it is impossible to think
of a way to comply with such laws.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/200 - Release Date: 14/12/05