-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
JAY JG wrote:
From: Jtkiefer
<jtkiefer(a)wordzen.net> Ryan Delaney wrote:
Yes it happens with quite a few policies most recently NPOV but
3RR is something that's not just like other policies where
occasionally issues pop up but 3RR at the fundamental level seems
to be flawed by the fact that it is misused by those who wish to
gain an upper edge in content disputes and administrators who try
to enforce it have to end up digging through edit warring and
conflicts many times and much of the time end up being villified
for it even more than administrators normally are for doing their
jobs... and coming from someone who gets threats and personal
attacks against him quite a bit that's saying a lot. Enforcing
3RR has become an everyday battle. ~~~~
The alternative is (and was) worse.
Jay.
You're right, of course. Part of the job of being in administration is
that you have to deal with unreasonable people, and this is certainly
no less true on Wikipedia. It's probably best to just sigh and move
on rather than take the trollish actions personally. Besides,
revoking 3RR because some people use it as an excuse for citations of
"administrator abuse" by "rouge admins" isn't going to be a
solution,
because those people will complain no matter what. 3RR is just the
excuse they use.
Ryan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDocuD6MKb8lYmCtcRAtPtAJ9Bc5QGyoQaeS9DX0gaU9TDFsMspACfdtZK
pameddvzNayW3R+qf2eEfU8=
=KFi2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----