[WikiEN-l] Nature compares science coverage of Wikipedia andEncyclopaedia Britannica

Wed Dec 14 20:23:55 UTC 2005

Delirium writes:

> _Nature_ tends to have fairly rigorous review standards 
> and a high level of article quality,

That's what I thought, until I saw this:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15457248&query_hl=1

The worst article EVARR!!! I wouldn't have accepted a paper like that
in my College Algebra class.

Axel

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 