[WikiEN-l] Improve AFD - require rationales (2-step process)

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Improve AFD - require rationales (2-step process)
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Improve AFD - require rationales (2-step process)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
David Gerard wrote:

> It's explicitly Not A Vote, so it's hard to see how to get around
> this one.
>
>
>I am tempted to summarily remove all tally boxes as blatant invitations
>to abuse of AFD as a straight vote.

Have you been in AFD recently? It is a vote. It always has been.
"Consensus" is determined, in EVERY afd, by counting the number of
delete votes versus the number of keep votes. Period. I recognize that
the policy says it's not a vote, but the policy might as well say the
moon is made of cheese.

Ryan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFDoHP86MKb8lYmCtcRAiN8AJ0Ye6HSiSYkh0Dr66o/jmli39J8TgCfdTlT
otLgF4lpI5+pfvWfy0lRM2g=
=osAz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Improve AFD - require rationales (2-step process)
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Improve AFD - require rationales (2-step process)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]