[WikiEN-l] Nature compares science coverage of Wikipedia and Encyclopaedia Britannica

Wed Dec 14 17:29:15 UTC 2005

  There is a general perception that we don't cover science well?  I thought we
were a lot stronger in the sciences than we are in the humanities.  My first
thought was that they had picked an area likely to flatter us.

              Jason

Quoting Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa at gmail.com>:
> If the reporting is accurate, this is a very significant finding,
> considering the general perception that Wikipedia doesn't cover
> science well.