Katefan0 wrote:
Thanks David. Please let me know what they say.
I just cc'd it to the AC for information ;-) We've had a few of these
come to our attention. (Just because it's obviously not an arbitration
matter doesn't mean we don't get EVERYTHING.)
I think we're getting toward some sensible way to treat these things
here in this thread.
I'd like to reiterate that the information I am
assuming he's unhappy
with wasn't backed up by sourcing, it was just a crazy
rant about his
relationship with UT and his book being biased.
Stuff like that, you cut it, say "see talk" in the edit summary and
say "source please" ;-)
- d.