On 12/12/05, stevertigo <vertigosteve(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
--- The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What evidence do you have that I'm being
sarcastic?
Intuition.
I actually am so glad that I don't have to believe in science for all those
engineers and scientists who do make my nice pretty computers and
internets and lightbulbs and keyboards and mp3 encodings and electric
guitars so i can listen to blink 182, which rocks the hardest.
Why do you say
that science has little compatibility
with religion?
I wrote 'for sake of argument, if we say...'
Okay, why, for the sake of argument, do we say that? I mean, is there
any evidence to support that claim? Because if there's not, it's
pretty silly to start a discussion based on the claim.
Are you making
the claim that science is
inconsistent with religion? If so, how?
No. See above.
Not even for the sake of argument?
Speaking of
the church dating scene, I wouldn't
denigrate the biological imperative for a reason
for people's behavior.
No denigration was implied.
Ah. I used my intuition there.