See
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/
William_M._Connolley&diff=9512576&oldid=9512379
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/
William_M._Connolley&oldid=9512805
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Pseudoscience
Fred
The statement of
On Dec 12, 2005, at 12:20 PM, stevertigo wrote:
Something else to talk about:
Some of our rather intelligent sciency people seem to
have an unusual inability to distinguish science from
neutrality. Ultimately, they tend to argue that
articles should hold a defacto deference to what is
essentially a Scientific Point of View, rather than a
Neutral Point of View.
How best to single these people out and correct their
behaviour? Any examples of articles in question? Isnt
the term "pseudoscience" a POV pejorative from the
SPOV?
Stevertigo
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l