Tony Sidaway wrote:
On 12/10/05, MacGyverMagic/Mgm
<macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>I'm saying that turning off AFD,
>or using an alternative tagging method like the one speedy uses now
>allows for articles that should be deleted to slip through the net.
>Especially when they have 2 weeks or a month to be manipulated.
Umm, you're saying that giving an article that
"should be deleted"
might, given time, actually improve to the point where it cannot be
deleted? Or am I misunderstanding what you're saying?
If it *is* what you're saying, then obviously that's wrong! We cannot
have people improving articles that someone else thinks should exist!
That will never do! :)
Indeed. MGM, you appear to be approaching article deletion as a win/lose
process, where keeping an article constitutes losing.
- d.