On 12/9/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/9/05, Anthony DiPierro
<wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 12/9/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 12/9/05, Anthony DiPierro
<wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
Well, we certainly have different theories on
what would happen.
Let's try it out and see.
Anthony
Tell you what lets go to the other extream and let admins deleted what
ever they like for a week. Would make RC patrol much less of a
problem.
--
geni
Wouldn't that give admins more responsibilities?
Since you allow then to delete anything they feel like they don't have
to be responcible. No messing around with does this fit criteria 7A or
whatever. We'd also probably find out if the 3RR applies to admin
actions. Personaly I suspect the resulting problems would provide a
fairly solid answer as to why the try it an see aproach isn't always a
good idea.
--
geni
No, it's not always a good idea. If we want to get ridiculous, I
could propose turning off editing for a week. Anyway, I suspected you
were just proposing something you don't actually want.
For my part, I don't think removing the rules over deletion and
letting admins do whatever they want (subject to review and reversal,
of course, and if some admin goes around deleting articles like
[[George Bush]], reprimand and loss of admin powers) is such a bad
thing that trying it for a week would be a mistake. In fact, if you
combined this with allowing users to see the content of those deleted
articles, I actually think it'd be the best solution.
Anthony