On 12/6/05, BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If we diagnose
what went wrong in the Seigenthaler case, this seems like
a very opportune place to try a small change of policy.
1. First, the Seigenthaler article was created by an anon.
What does that have to do with anything? Please assume good faith. The
person who wrote the text might have gotten Seigenthaler mixed up with
another person who might actually have been suspected of being a
Soviet spy etc. A registered user could aswell have made the same
mistake.
I think not allowing unreferenced articles would be a great help too.
I bet the anon didn't provide any source (or they would've discovered
their own mistake if it was one).
Mgm