The results are one sided. There is a mountain of evidence. Nobs is
being railroaded, and Cberlet appears about to be given authority to
cite himself whenever and wherever he might find an opinion, based on
his "expert" status. I don't contest that he merits an article (altho
it is a bit of a resume), but I do contest his neutrality and range of
expertise. That, combined w the mountains of evidence against him and
the conflict he has fostered (5 people he rounded up and shoved
together just in this one case!) should provide all the proof you need
of the difficulty he presents.
Sam Spade
On 12/4/05, Matt Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From what I can
see, the arbitrators are doing quite well with a difficult case.
-Matt
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l